半小时后走出大派展厅，转入旁边的大昌展厅———— [复制链接]

markat 在 2003-12-13 10:59:50 发表的内容 高价都没有造出好声的机，造几千元的机出来就一定要填海了。嘎嘎！

还是担心你自己吧.
如果大派真正造出几千元的机来的话,我看你想哭都找不到坟头.

既然这么多位都不怕当间谍，那么我也继续顶。

还在吵????????

听说以前是郑

我想那些想看大派笑话的人一定不会想到，这个贴子这么快就上到26页，正是一个商家求之不得的。人家不怕你骂，就怕没人知道。反正是好是坏到时一听就知，是好的骂不坏，是坏的也说不好。可是如今广告费用可不低。
M大侠是否考虑该请我们几个喝一杯？为你顶了这么多天也不容易……

KENTRYFO 在 2003-12-14 15:44:43 发表的内容 你们想不想知道大派的老板和设计师是谁？我贪玩的脾气又出来了，好玩儿！！！！

who?????

KENTRYFO 在 2003-12-14 15:44:43 发表的内容 你们想不想知道大派的老板和设计师是谁？我贪玩的脾气又出来了，好玩儿！！！！

想。

声音取向各有拥者。宽频、大力、快速和甜、暧厚是没高下之分的，胆机石味不也很多人喜欢吗？（珠海胆机听说在国外很受欢迎）！
成功与否关键在于
1。有自已声音特色
2。有高性价比（能胜价格高一级进口机，这价位应有与ML383、贵风合并机、骗美合并机、ARS合并机。。。对阵能力）
3。还要有坚持实力（让人认识过程）
。。。。。。

madog 在 2003-12-14 14:29:16 发表的内容 rogerwewe 在 2003-12-14 13:55:05 发表的内容 大昌也想做广告，哈哈。。。 你说器材低频好、细节丰富，可是归结为线材或录音导致的高频过亮，也不见得吧？ 你感谢阿泰，那不是给他锅背吗？ 不知此帖到底能否超过6.6，期待中。。。。 Almost forgot, I do not represent Dai Chong nor Mr.Chan who is not an internet freak but someone told him there is a gentlemen Ah Tai  etc.etc. Whatever you say, that is not something personal or emotional or to give any credits to anyone, Sorry to make you misunderstand. Cables would not change the quality of the signal (provided that the conductors are rather pure) but would alter the state of the signal passing throught it, such as it could influent the quantity of certain frequency passing through it. If one's electronic(s) would happen phase error, then, the lost of higher harmonic would suffer. Please be calm down. We are not kids anymore, this is a friendly discussion but not to fight and belly fill with gas.

阿泰 在 2003-12-8 15:49:23 发表的内容 salu 在 2003-12-8 10:40:11 发表的内容 车大炮 在 2003-12-7 1:45:24 发表的内容 因为有好多人说大派胆机的不是，这回我专门到大派的展厅听个究竟，大派胆机今天推的是JK的PM-122II大型音箱，我用了约半小时，听了多首乐曲，歌曲。 出来后转到旁边的大昌展厅，一入门口，我就发觉，刚才我浪费了那半小时！ 可能有人说是什么回事，说也没用，你在两个地方听过之后就有答案了。 陳經綸確實比大派有派頭，手上拿的是煙斗而不是咪頭，細絲腳架的無框眼鏡，在細節上很會作派的，害我有想買個煙斗的衝動。造形上跟天朗的紳士風格滿般配的，加分！嘿嘿！ 不過這次的超高音喇叭的表現還是稍過了點，稍銳利了點，感覺有點生澀，像新喇叭沒有煲透似的，配合不了紳士的那種醇和泰然的味道，有點失衡了，減分！ 陳經綸的演示和器材表現相得益彰，都貴氣滿堂。 那天反應熱烈到他想去吃飯都不行，慘！！！

Yeah, the high frequency is a bit sharp in some recording but I think the   most important performance is, the system has the ability to preserve all
the details. This I guess could be rectified by changing other interconnect
or speaker cable. If it can change it to more mellow, soft but with speed, then it will be regarded as a high-end system. The most important issue in a
system is, they (all electronics) are capable to reproduce all the details,
nuance from the software (CD). then we can tailor the sound how they
express in a way we think the best.
If one system does not own such quality, then no matter what sort of cable
or interconnect one used has not good result. That is, as Mr.Chan commented in his music demo, he always emphasize the resolution of the
electronics and the bass region is the best way to demonstrate the
capability of the amps, CD players, DAC, etc.etc.
The harsh high frequency you'd heard, I think is the measure of enegy in such a way, depands where you sit (the distance between your goodself
and the loudspeaker.
Mr. Chan also stated that, good system should full-fill the room with music
regardless of where you sit or stand, but the best way to hear the focus of the solo instrument or vocal, of course should be in the middle of the
loudspeakers and somewhere away from them.
I still remember Mr.Chan said many years ago, " turn on your system and
walk our from your music room, if you feel that you can feel the music is
player as if somebody(s) is(are) playing live, then it shouldn't be a bad
system."

I am not trying to coaching people but I think Mr. Chan's comments are
quite OK.

Sorry folks, I can only type English and fogive my poor Chinese typing.

By the way, Ah Tai, Mr. Chan would like to thank you for the comment you
had written and he wanted me to show his appreciations to you and to
CHIR DAI PAU.