发烧论坛

注册

 

发新话题 回复该主题

38度5 线材用家专栏。 [复制链接]

1#

您好,

请您提供对线材的专业看法。
我喜欢听乐器爵士,弦乐(大、小提琴)及类似蔡琴的“机遇”般较宁静的人声,希望结像力好,不要有任何加重、音染的效果,现有的器材如下,

功放:欧博 M100-10 纪念版
CD:Philips CD-950 当转盘
解码器:朝露D1.3, 运放AD2604 x 3
同轴线:类似秋叶原的4N,约200元买的
信号线:自制的1M,超时空方芯铜,单芯
喇叭线:自制网上买的AQ Gibraltar 散线,双线分音(150/米,看来似甲的
喇叭:东讯的仿 ProAc 2.5

1。Tara Labs RSC Air 1的喇叭线与 AQ Pikes Peak比较如何? 等级?音色?
2。Tara Labs RSC Air 2 的喇叭线与 AQ Pikes Peak比较如何?
3.。全新的Tara Labs RSC Air 1 3 M 10000元(RMB)值得买吗? 全新的Tara Labs RSC Air 2 3 M 8000元(RMB)值得买吗? 你会挑哪一个?
4。AQ 的 Jaguar DBS 与TaraLabs , 在我的器材上配得来吗?


谢谢您
分享 转发
TOP
2#

您好,

1。可否提供您的最新Gibraltar的照片
2。美洲虎与猎豹的差异是什么?
TOP
3#

许兄您好,

1.    想麻烦您代为寻找Mont Blanc 24VDBS的买家, 自audiogoN 买的线,约95成新,两头皆香蕉头(AQ的),本来打算改为双线分音的,但在看了Audioquest 公司给音响销售员的教材后,觉得不妥,希望能出6500。我的电话:上海13901957535
2.    如果能出掉,我想买您的Gibraltar DBS Single biwire.
3.    顺便请您看看我所看到的您是否认同。如下
a)    双线分音的目标是用较少的费用达到较高的效果。
b)    两条线的双线分音一定比一条单线的好。
c)    用2条较便宜的线(如CV6)作双线分音,远比用贵得多的一条线(如PikePeaks,Mont Balnc, Vocalno)作双线分音效果好,Flat Rock除外。
d)    3音路音箱,可用物理结构类似、材质不同的两条线,2音路则必须是同材质的两条线,才不致影响其音箱的分频点。
e)    如果无法解决高音的磁干扰,双线分音会比单线+跳线差。
f)    单线时,再便宜的PSC跳线也比原厂附带的镀金铜片好。
g)    单线+跳线,2音路时,音箱线正接高音、负接低音效果最好;3音路时,音箱线正、负都接到高音效果最好。
h)    Flat Rock(如Gibraltar) 的设计是完美的双线分音, Earth Feature(如 Mont Blanc)的设计是最不合适的,由于其同轴逆向的物理结构。
i)    Earth Feature的线做成双线分音,全然是因为客户的需求,因为客户喜欢它做成双线分音。

还有一些就不说了,您认同上述的观点吗,可否请您一一的解答,我想这也是很多发烧友想知道的。
谢谢您
TOP
4#

AQ的教材--关于双线分音
http://www.soundcity.com/info/faqsbiwiring.html
What is Biwiring?
Bi-wire by Audioquest!!!
This article is to help consumers to increase their understanding of BiWiring and clarify some misunderstandings. Many of today's speakers can be BiWired meaning the speaker has inputs for the woofer and separate inputs for the upper frequency ranges. Should you BiWire? If so, should you biwire with a single cable (Single BiWire / SBW) or with two separate cables (Double-BiWire / DBW)? Read on.
  
The whole idea of BiWiring often leads to the question "is BiWiring so important that I should spend twice as much on cable?" Maybe it is worth spending twice as much on cable in general, but that's a separate question. BiWiring is a way to save money or to get higher performance for the same price. The BiWiring question is not about how much money to spend, but about how to get the most performance for one's money. BiWiring is a way of providing your customers more value for the amount of money they spend.
  
When using a single speaker cable (not BiWiring) the large amounts of bass energy have an adverse effect on the upper frequencies. BiWiring is done in order to substantially reduce the distortion caused by speaker cable. In a BiWire set-up the cable feeding the higher ranges no longer handles the large magnetic fields caused by the high current needed to produce bass. BiWiring does not affect the bass fundamentals, but the treble signal now travels a less distorted path. A little like the difference between swimming through waves versus through smooth water. The bass will sound better because bass definition (harmonics) is in the midrange and higher frequencies. It is worthwhile to take advantage of the benefits of BiWiring when the speaker manufacturer has gone to the extra expense of providing this capability. The performance benefits of reducing distortion this way are substantial.
  
When BiWiring, the two cables must either be identical, or have essentially identical geometries. If the cables have different geometries they will have different inductance and capacitance. Capacitance and inductance are the values used to create a loudspeaker’s low-pass and high-pass networks (together making a crossover). Different values in the two cables effectively redesigns the crossover … not a good thing! The integrity and coherence of the speaker will be compromised.
  
For best performance, use two of the same cables. If the speaker has a low crossover point (a 3-way speaker or a panel-hybrid such as Martin Logan) much of the benefit of using two identical cables can be realized by using two cables which have the same geometry, but which use different qualities of metal. CV-4 paired with Type-4 to drive the bass, for example. Why do this? Price: It’s less expensive.
  
This “trick” does not work for 2-way speakers. They have their BiWire access frequency above the midrange … music and voice and practically everything else is in the midrange and must be given full respect. Use two identical cables.
  
Another option is using a single cable that can be divided to BiWire with. We call this Single-BiWire (SBW). This works better with some cables than with others – but BiWiring using two separate cables is always better. We do not recommend you Single-BiWiwire with a Quad-Helix model (Type-2, Type-4, CV-4, KE-4). If you are curious, make up two sets of cables and listen for yourself. Even more importantly, please understand that, except for the Flat-Rock Series, it is better to use two less expensive cables than to Single-BiWire with one better cable. Using two pairs of CV-6 is better than a Single-BiWired Mont Blanc, for example.
The Flat-Rock Series (Slate, Bedrock, Rockefeller, Gibraltar) are excellent for Single-BiWiring. While optimized for use as full-range cables, these models, when used as Single-BiWire cables, actually become a specialized true Double-BiWire thanks to their two Quad-Helix component. The two groups of conductors have a degree of magnetic autonomy found in no other single cable. Pretty cool, don’t you think?
Just as the Flat-Rock Series is excellent for Single-BiWiring, the Earth-Feature Series (Pikes Peak to Everest), is the poorest for SBW. One of the significant advantages of these cables is the unusually effective way they manage the relationships between magnetic fields. The conductors spiral in opposite directions, but the positive and negative groups form two tubes whose relationship is constant and non-changing. Dividing the conductors in these models does very little to separate the magnetic fields of the bass and treble groups.
  
That leaves the 6-Series in which Single-BiWiring is effective, though only half as effective as running a Double-BiWire of CV-4.
  
One can Double-BiWire by stacking connectors at the amp, or by simply ordering Double-BiWire cables. We simply join the two cables together at the amp end before attaching the terminations. The price is simply the same as adding together the price of the two cables, whether the same model or different models.
  
You, as the expert, are in the best position to evaluate your customer’s needs. 1) You may choose to sell the customer (for example) a Single-BiWire Pikes Peak because Single-BiWire is what the customer demands. 2) Or you may recommend two pairs of CV-6 because that is what will sound best. 3) Or you may recommend a single Full-Range pair of Pikes Peak and a set of AudioQuest PSC Jumpers to replace the disgusting sounding gold over nickel plated brass (or worse) pieces supplied with the speakers … this is the best way to leave open the possibility of adding another pair of Pikes Peak later, or better yet, a set of Mont Blanc or Kilimanjaro on the treble if the speaker is a 3-way.
  
When using a single set of cables to a BiWirable speaker, you might as well do it properly … it costs nothing and makes a difference you can hear. When using jumpers (factory supplied or replacements), be sure to put both red and black connectors to the treble input of a 3-way or panel-hybrid. Bass is less sensitive to having the jumpers in the signal path.
  
For 2-way speakers, be sure to put red to treble and black to bass … this is the only way to preserve the tonal voice the speaker designer intended.
  
If you do not BiWire, at the very least, please connect a single set of speaker cables as recommended above, and then if you’re not comfortable enough in the role of the expert to sell a $20 set of AQ PSC Jumpers, then use a small piece of solid conductor, or a cable like AQ Type 1, to do the jumping. Just as better electronics do not come with poor interconnect cables, it is best to pretend your fine speakers simply did not come with cheap stamped metal jumpers. It’s entirely accurate to describe the free shiny metal jumpers as “worth every penny you paid for them.”
TOP
5#

许兄您好,

对于您所提的双线分音建议 CV6.2+Type6.2, 其效果与一条Gibraltar比较如何?您试过吗?
谢谢
TOP
6#

许兄您好,

请问DBS的音箱线放了约半年不用后,仍需要煲吗?
1。今天我换上一条Mont Blanc 24V, 觉得声音发闷,此线约有半年没用了。
2。觉得闷,是与我从AudiogoN买的,无法断定真假的RSC Air1比较。
3。觉得(可能是假的)Air1 很透,清澈(非亮),Mont Blanc 的音乐性明显较好,但闷。
依你的经验,这样是对的吗?还是需煲一段时间?
谢谢您
TOP
7#

谢谢许兄快速的回复,

如何增加电压?您这儿有吗? 如何作?自己可以吗?从没搞过DBS。
TOP
8#

许兄,
还有,感觉比 Kimber 8 TC 还差。
TOP
9#

许兄您好,

抱歉,我的Mont Blanc 是36V的,黑色塑胶的电池盒,请再告知如何增加电压,你有36V的吗?请发短信。
TOP
10#

许兄您好,

继续Mont blanc de 的升压问题,我不喜欢很机械的高低频延伸,希望是较自然的,
1。超过72V,会不会有太Hifi 而失去音乐性的问题? 我希望用你的48V。36+48=84V
2。请告诉我邮费到上海及您的建行帐号。
3。是不是在这里写明我的地址?
TOP
11#

看到紫荆花的好评如潮,有人能给个看法吗?
1。紫荆花与黑豹DBS那个较出色?
2。定位及成像的比较?
3。哪个较适合欧博M100-10 EL34?
TOP
12#

许兄,

紫荆花终极版还有吗?价格?请发短信
TOP
13#

你好,
你对AQ Mont Blanc 有兴趣吗? 用一对Mont Blanc,2.5M,原厂货36V+48V(许兄的)与你换黑豹+ 直布罗陀?
TOP
14#

[quote]wangyao 在 2005-11-21 16:29:45 发表的内容
有意出AQ 的直布罗佗,许兄制,48V,2。5米长,CMC香焦头。
2800元。
13852356565
QQ:173400656[/quote]

你好,
你对AQ Mont Blanc 有兴趣吗? 用一对Mont Blanc,2.5M,原厂货36V+48V(许兄的)与你换黑豹+ 直布罗陀?
TOP
发新话题 回复该主题