发烧论坛

注册

 

发新话题 回复该主题

A Recommendation on Beethoven's 9th Symphony(一老外眼里的贝... [复制链接]

1#
The best performance and recording--by far--that I've ever heard of
Ludwig van Beethoven's Symphony No. 9 in D Minor, Op. 125 was
conducted by Richard Edlinger and performed by the Zagreb Philharmonic
in September 1988. This recording has been published as Beethoven:
Symphony No. 9 'Choral' (Naxos 8.550181), and in the five-CD sets
Beethoven: Symphonies Nos. 1-9 (Complete) (Lydian 18501), and
Beethoven: Symphonies Nos. 1-9 (Complete) (Amadis 7501). (Amadis is
the current budget-brand of Naxos, and was formerly under the name
Lydian. These two five-CD sets are apparently identical, as far as the
actual recordings go.) This is an all-digital recording (stereo, DDD).
This recording has also appeared in various other Naxos sets.

I own Naxos 8.550181, which is no longer in print. But this recording
is the fith CD in the Lydian 18501 and Amadis 7501 sets, of which I
see that the Lydian 18501 set seems to be the one currently available
from online stores. I do not own nor have I listened to the other
recordings in these sets, but going based only on this recording of
the 9th Symphony, I can emphatically recommend and indeed urge that
people get this set (all the more since the entire set is going for
the price of a single typically-priced CD).

Beethoven is my favorite composer, and I've been collecting recordings
of his 9th Symphony since my early teens (I'm currently 28 years of
age). Beethoven's 9th Symphony is my single favorite piece of music.
Currently I only own five different performances and recordings of the
9th Symphony, although previously I've owned quite a number more.
Besides Naxos 8.550181, I also currently own the recordings of Wilhelm
Furtwängler conducting the Chor und Orchester der Bayreuther
Festspiele on July 29, 1951 (mono, ADD, EMI 5 66953 2), and Herbert
von Karajan conducting the Berliner Philharmoniker in October 1962
(stereo, ADD, Deutsche Grammophone 447 401-2), among others.

But of all the many different performances of Beethoven's 9th Symphony
that I've listened to in great detail, none have I found that come
anywhere close to the competency, grace, grandeur, and emotional power
of the performance given by Richard Edlinger and the Zagreb
Philharmonic. It makes all the other recordings of the 9th Symphony
that I've heard figuratively seem like jerry-built contraptions
hobbled together with duct tape and Bondo by comparison, i.e., an
attempt at something that they didn't have the resources (i.e., skill)
available to do right; or even more often, straining at trying to
achieve a goal without knowing how to do it.

Whereas the prowess and the intellectual and emotional command of the
material displayed by Richard Edlinger and the Zagreb Philharmonic on
this recording is breathtaking--as if they have untold skill in
reserve and are just having fun toying with us puny humans. Never do
they come to a passage wherein it seems as if they're lost and don't
know what they're doing. From the first sound of the first movement to
the last in the fourth movement, it feels as if every sound takes its
place and truly belongs, with no sound seeming out of place. And every
passage is performed at a tempo which makes it lock into the entire
movement, forming a seamlessly coherent whole. The result conveyed is
a masterfully articulate performance wherein the masters know
precisely, exactly what it is that they are doing at every moment, and
execute their intention just as they had wanted; moreover, that
Richard Edlinger and the Zagreb Philharmonic have an exceedingly
profound understanding of what it takes to make every passage, every
note, every vocal utterance fit perfectly within the entirety of this
work.

While all the movements on this recording are performed with this
phenomenal adroitness and deep comprehension, most stunning of all is
the fourth movement, especially the choral performance. The vocals
come through loud, clear and awesomely beautiful. One can actually
hear the words pronounced, instead of being a muddled mess like on a
number of recordings of the 9th Symphony. The hormonics created by the
choir are heavenly, as if a host of radiant angels had just descended
from paradise, bringing with them, in song, otherworldly and divine
music. Never have I heard the choral arrangements of the 9th Symphony
performed with such poised competency as on this recording.

Now I say the foregoing based solely on the actual performance, and
not the technical quality of the recording medium or the conditions
under which it was obtained. But when we come to the fidelity of the
actual recording, this performance has been superbly, exquisitely
captured. Although the printed material that came with my CD doesn't
say, based just on listening to the recording, I take it that it's a
studio recording, as there are no coughs, sniffles, or other
extraneous noises to be found, and indeed no clapping at the end of
the fourth movement. And given that no specific day is listed for the
performance, I assume it might have been recorded over the course of
some days in September 1988, possibly with a number of takes.

If the latter part of the previous sentence is the case, then it
somewhat helps in explaining how this masterwork came to be. Although
it is the penetrating choices made in how to perform this piece and
the sheer skill of its execution which makes it the truly magnificent
treasure that it is.

---

Ludwig van Beethoven
Symphony No. 9 in D Minor, Op. 125

Zagreb Philharmonic
Conductor: Richard Edlinger

Gabriele Lechner, Soprano
Diane Elias, Mezzo-Soprano
Michael Pabst, Tenor
Robert Holzer, Bass

Recorded in Zagreb in September 1988.

All-digital recording (stereo, DDD)
分享 转发
TOP
2#

My favorite, on the other hand, is Weingartner/VPO 1935
TOP
3#

Tennstedt/London Phil.,1991 in the Memories complete set. The Alpha and Omega. The only one I can really put in the same league as Furtwangler '42. Klemp live on Testament '57 , Szell live on Living Stage from Vienna '68, and Bruno Walter live from Vienna '55 on Orfeo D'or are just slightly less than those two imo. But those 5 are far ahead of anything I've come across. Which means 50 or more others including the one lauded in the original post which I found run of the mill at best.
TOP
4#

I'll add my own observation here. Karajan's early '60s version was the very first 9th I purchased on LP (c. 1978), so I've lost count of how many times I've listened to it over the years. I've always found it to be nearly out of control in most of the first movement, from about the middle all the way to the end, and in parts of the second movement as well. "Nearly" is the operative word here. It sounds to my ears as though (1) Karajan is pushing the orchestra at one blistering pace and (2) the orchestra itself is moving at an almost equally (but different) blistering pace and (3) it seems to be only by sheer luck that the two entities come back together without falling on their collective faces. Yes, there is slight exaggeration in my comments...but ONLY slight. Some people might find it thrilling, but more and more in replaying this performance I find myself perceiving it as sloppy. I most definitely prefer precision and control in tandem with extreme speed. This conductor/orchestra disconnect seems to reappear in the second
movement but the problem clears up much more quickly and the playing improves from that point on. Still, in those two sections, I'd have to agree with the comments of the OP.
TOP
5#

Peter T. Daniels wrote:> Why is "extreme speed" a Good Thing?

It isn't, necessarily. It provides visceral excitement and an opportunity for virtuosic display, of course, but to each his own. More to the point of this discussion, it exists in Karajan's version of the LvB 9th, and if a conductor (or a solo musician, for that matter) is going to offer us that as an approach for a particular piece, I personally want to hear precision and control providing a foundation.
By the same token, extreme slowness also takes superb concentration and care to pull off well if one is to avoid audience foot-shuffling or snores--c.f., any of a number of solo pieces by Sviatoslav Richter (often he pulls it off, sometimes he doesn't).
Remember, too, these comments represent my opinion--nothing that's binding on anyone else.
TOP
6#

Actually, Cheryl Studer can be heard in TWO recordings of LvB's 9th.
Cheryl Studer, Delores Ziegler, Peter-Maria Schnitzer (nee Seiffert),
James Morris
The Westminster Choir, Director: Joseph Flummerfelt
The Philadelphia Orchestra, Conductor: Riccardo Muti
Recording: Memorial Hall, Philadelphia, April 1988
EMI CDC 7 49493 2
Cheryl Studer, Anke Vondung, Christian Elsner, Johannes Schw=E4rsky
Philharmonie der Nationen, Conductor: Justus Frantz
Live recording: Konzerthaus am Gendarmenmarkt zu Berlin
12 January 2003
TOP
7#

Have you heard the performance by Benjamin Zander? The 9th synphony isn't a particular favourite of mine, but I do like the 5th, and bought a copy  based on personal recommendation from someone who has worked with him. Zander takes particular care to keep to Beethoven's prescribed metronome markings, which few others do, and seems also to have a rare personality
that can inspire others to great efforts. If you think you know the 5th (and who doesn't?), this version will be a revelation, almost like listening to a new piece of music. The CD comes with a bonus disk where he explains the symphony and his approach to it, which is fascinating. He has also recorded the 9th and everybody seems to think it's a good one, so if it's your favourite I'm sure you'll find it interesting at least.
Check out www.benjaminzander.com for details.
TOP
8#

I think Furtwangler/BPO/1942 is pretty much the final word here.Nothing else really compares. If you haven't heard it yet, you simply must do so!
For something in modern sound, I hold Barenboim/Berliner Staatskapelle in quite high esteem.
TOP
9#

The Furt `42 is truly one of the all time great performances. Another awesome rendition is his `54 at Lucerne 9th. There is plenty of room for all sorts of interpretations. I have like 10 different versions of the 9th. They are all special in different ways, but Furtwangler is someone VERY SPECIAL. There is no ONE way to play Beethoven. And for the record -- Furtwangler is not necessarily "slow." He CHANGES tempo often, sometimes speeding up (actually going faster than conventional practice) and then slooowing down; always milking every dramatic moment. Yes, his Adagio clocks in at almost twice the time as most other versions, but MY GOD! -- the emotion he creates! Nobody conducts like him anymore -- the romantic Wagner school style. After becoming exposed to Furt I now find a lot of so-called "correct performances," i.e., "modern," to be boring. Beethoven himself was known to never play the same piece the same way, so I very much doubt he would disapprove of the Furt recordings.
Another ultimate Furt performance is the 5th symphony -- NOBODY did the scherzo to finale transistion better. In fact, I now can not listen to any other 5th without a tinge of disappointment. Such is genius -- it shows you the mediocrity in everything else.
TOP
10#

" My favorite, on the other hand, is Weingartner/VPO 1935"

YAHA,You can say that again!
That's a great performance .

and Bruno Walter live from Vienna '55 on Orfeo D'or
Very Nice!Better than the stereo recording on CBS conducted by himself!
TOP
11#

问我吗?我不是老外,转载。
TOP
12#

兄台的英文不错啊,但是 Edlinger 的萨格勒布爱乐的这张唱片你听过没有啊?
TOP
发新话题 回复该主题