Rogers乐爵士音箱用家专栏 [复制链接]

都是有品位的箱子。

[quote] 原帖由 [b]DynaKrell[/b] 于 2009-4-9 9:49:00 发表
刚买了一对ROGERS LS3/5A，正式加入3/5A的俱乐部
因为客厅有一套JBL的4343，所以一直没买3/5A，但是发现自己其实在书房呆的时间最多，曾经在书房用过AE、JBL4301等箱子，始终觉得不够满意，而且大多没法放在我的电脑显示器边上，所以一直想买一对3/5A了却心头一桩心愿
正好这几天厦门熟悉的一位烧友要出手，顺势拿下，总算圆了我10几年的3/5A梦，也为我的书房构架一套完美系 [/quote]
我都想拥有！

[quote] 原帖由 [b]zyh[/b] 于 2009-4-13 16:28:00 发表
俺改完惠威了：） [/quote]
我还以为R记出了新款？

我是用Studio7的，建议所有R记的喇叭都用铁架，这样才会体现到R记的韵味！

[quote] 原帖由 [b]8823021[/b] 于 2009-6-2 22:05:00 发表
rogers studio7，脚架是铸铁，有顶。后经zyh指点，垫上橡胶皮（补鞋子的那种），音场开阔，顺滑，且弹性十足，低蘋下潜深了许多。
[/quote]
Studio7的可塑性非常高，低频的质数直逼落地箱效果，慢慢玩吧！

[quote] 原帖由 [b]lsh1982[/b] 于 2009-5-27 22:20:00 发表
studio7的一点资料

Rogers 好聽喇叭 studio 7 出售(二手/$25000/台北市)

The Studio 7:

This was a redesign of the Studio 1a by Andy Whittle in 1993. The enclosure and bass/mid driver were retained from the Studio 1a, but the metal-dome tweeter was replaced by a 25mm soft-dome unit from Scanspeak. The bass alignment was altered to produce a drier, less boomy sound in a typical domestic environment. According to a review in the June 1993 issue of Hi-Fi News, the Studio 7 was much smoother and better balanced compared to the already high standard set by the 1a. Price then was £880 per pair.

外觀良好 八隻角無一撞凹 聲音自然滑順 是studio 1a 的改良新產品 歡迎預約試聽 歐洲原價880英磅 臺灣訂價為56000元 studio 1a 的訂價只有36000元 喇叭與studio 1a 同樣大小。  [/quote]
Studio7确实是studio 1a 的改良版，但ST7和ST1A的风格区别比较大的。1A我听过，非常有味道，我个人感觉要比5/9l来的自然和亲切。而St7就相对现代，注重了速度和高频的延伸，感觉更加全面，但1a的韵味就很难在ST7身上体现，我现在一直在往这个方向调整，开始有点味道了！

[quote] 原帖由 [b]lsh1982[/b] 于 2009-5-27 22:20:00 发表
studio7的一点资料

Rogers 好聽喇叭 studio 7 出售(二手/$25000/台北市)

The Studio 7:

This was a redesign of the Studio 1a by Andy Whittle in 1993. The enclosure and bass/mid driver were retained from the Studio 1a, but the metal-dome tweeter was replaced by a 25mm soft-dome unit from Scanspeak. The bass alignment was altered to produce a drier, less boomy sound in a typical domestic environment. According to a review in the June 1993 issue of Hi-Fi News, the Studio 7 was much smoother and better balanced compared to the already high standard set by the 1a. Price then was £880 per pair.

外觀良好 八隻角無一撞凹 聲音自然滑順 是studio 1a 的改良新產品 歡迎預約試聽 歐洲原價880英磅 臺灣訂價為56000元 studio 1a 的訂價只有36000元 喇叭與studio 1a 同樣大小。  [/quote]
Studio7确实是studio 1a 的改良版，但ST7和ST1A的风格区别比较大的。1A我听过，非常有味道，我个人感觉要比5/9l来的自然和亲切。而St7就相对现代，注重了速度和高频的延伸，感觉更加全面，但1a的韵味就很难在ST7身上体现，我现在一直在往这个方向调整，开始有点味道了！
[b]Studio 1a's:[/b]
The Studio 1a's are a more recent development, and at a glance appear to have more in common with the [url=http://www.mhennessy3.f9.co.uk/rogers/ls7.htm][color=#800080]LS7[/color][/url] than the earlier Studio 1's. They are a two-way design, using a clear polypropylene cone woofer and a dome tweeter. [color=#0000ff]Click here to read the Studio 1a brochure[/color], kindly submitted by Cliff Law.
Thanks are due again to Andrey Tiurpenko for sending me these pictures:

[table=98%][tr][td][img=240,383]http://www.mhennessy3.f9.co.uk/rogers/studio1a_1.jpg[/img][/td][td][img=240,383]http://www.mhennessy3.f9.co.uk/rogers/studio1a_2.jpg[/img][/td][/tr][/table]As you can see, they support "buy-wiring", as the market demanded at the time. As you can see, the connectors are mounted directly onto the rear panel, rather than the thin plastic tray seen on the LS7 and others. The dimensions are the same as the Studio 1's.

[table=98%][tr][td][img=240,240]http://www.mhennessy3.f9.co.uk/rogers/studio1a_3.jpg[/img][/td][td][img=240,240]http://www.mhennessy3.f9.co.uk/rogers/studio1a_4.jpg[/img][/td][/tr][/table]From the picture at least, the woofer looks identical to the unit used in the LS7t - does anyone know different? The tweeter is a 34mm metal dome unit made by Celestion.
I haven't had the chance to hear them myself, but Andrey says that compared to the LS7t's, the "Studio [1a] has better sound in all respects", which I can easily believe as they cost nearly double when new.

[quote] 原帖由 [b]san123[/b] 于 2009-6-3 10:33:00 发表
各位大侠，以下是我网上找到的资料：
木架和铁架同一高度应该是木架中频和人声表现好一些,铁架只要设计得合理也相当不错特别是在背景宁静度和底频冲击力一般木架是无可相比的,我用的器材是单端6V6推加拿大 风韵 我自己用铁仿制德国Foundation架跟我以前用的黑武士相拼黑武士输得很惨,简直无可抬头,因为单端机本身人声和中频以是很好了,用铁架来祢补他的功率小底频不足可以说是很相衬的.
请问下ROGERS的脚架应该选木还是铁啊？！ [/quote]
铁的！我是用过木和铁的，得出的结论是：木是比较有利于高频暗的音箱，木会标高高频的，放到我的ST7上就很薄和干，而R记的音色都比较清甜，不象一些老牌的英国箱那么浓厚甚至朦胧的喇叭。用铁有两个理由，一、R记的喇叭需要一个扎实的地基，因为R记低频是软绵的风格，她不是拳头到肉的，因此就要提升低频的质量来离补她的不足；二、铁架给我的感觉是韵味十足的，比较内敛。无论什么架都要主意谐振，一旦没有相应的谐振就会变成死板和刚硬！

[b]The Studio 7:[/b]
This was a redesign of the Studio 1a by Andy Whittle in 1993. The enclosure and bass/mid driver were retained from the Studio 1a, but the metal-dome tweeter was replaced by a 25mm soft-dome unit from Scanspeak. The bass alignment was altered to produce a drier, less boomy sound in a typical domestic environment. According to a review in the June 1993 issue of Hi-Fi News, the Studio 7 was much smoother and better balanced compared to the already high standard set by the 1a. Price then was £880 per pair.
这是一个重新设计的1a由Andy惠特尔在1993年。外壳和低音/中保留了工作室1A的设计理念，但金属穹顶高音被取而代之的是一个25毫米软圆顶单位Scanspeak 。低音调整是改变，声音非常典型。据审查， 1993年6月发行的Hi - Fi的新闻，这家工作室7十分畅顺，更能平衡相比，已高标准所规定的1A款。当时的价格每双八百八英镑。

[quote] 原帖由 [b]san123[/b] 于 2009-6-3 12:06:00 发表

各位大侠，以下是小陶大侠的观点摘录：
小陶:铁架低频好点，但论质感和味道，木架胜出成条街。特别听小提琴。
个人觉得ROGERS的低频不难弄，高频反而容易发亮，所以木架更稳妥。
胡桃木轻了点，要低频沉稳，味道又保持的话，可以试下柚木或黑檀木的木架，两者又以黑檀更为沉实，不过价格比较高。
君子的铁架也不错，但以音乐感而言，我始终觉得木架来得质朴和有生命力，特别是木味和质感强烈。
0.6米稍高，0.5更适合点。，当然，脚架高度对音场影响很大，换个矮点的脚架音场会沉稳不少的。
究竟我的ROGERS LS7t的脚架应该选木还是铁啊？！
[/quote]
你不妨自己尝试木架！不要凭感觉认为木是有木味，铁就感觉没有生命力，我开始都是这样想当然去配木架的，为什么我说过我玩过木架？也是象你这样理解，结果是不如理想的。最后还是用回铁架。还有不管小陶大师说过木架如何好，事实现在他老人家已经专用泰哥出品的铁架了！我们只是把走过的路给大家分享，决定还是要根据自己的具体情况来判断！