卡农 在 2006-9-6 14:04:03 发表的内容
kenbeyond 在 2006-9-5 23:15:21 发表的内容
recorders 在 2006-9-5 20:34:12 发表的内容
泼点冷水，p3的声音是缩在箱子里的，不动听。 |
基本同意, 我家里也有一对P3ES-2.
这箱的声场,定位,动态,低频不太行. |
不知道用啥推的.
动态低频不行同意.
用到高品质100W的功率,,其它方面我想会令朋友们对它大为改观. |
同意卡农兄的看法，小弟是用AYRE K3X/V3对P3进行拷问，基本上收拾的服服贴贴了，至于低频和动态方面，也让P3的小单元发挥到了极至。
不过需要注意的是，HARBETH官网上的FAQ对POWER的讨论好象比较不推荐用大功率（原因竟是社会问题^_^），当然大部分的厂家都说自己的箱子好推，否则会把顾客吓跑的：）
“5. How much power do I need to drive Harbeth speakers? (See also Q7 and Q12)
Far less than you might think! This is really two questions . . . a) how much power do I need to generate the loudness I want and b) how easy a load are the speakers. Agree?
a) We all know that it's nice to have a big engine so that we can occasionally 'put our foot down' but what is the real relevance of all that power for normal town motoring? We have a social responsibility to our neighbours (and to our own ears) and I've always found that 100W per channel or so has provided a really loud sound on those rare occasions when the neighbours are out and the mood takes me! But for normal use - 20 or 30W in a small room really can be loud.
b) When we are designing the crossover network we're acutely conscious that many of our users are far from the factory, do not speak English and have a wide choice of amplifiers none of which we will be able to test. So we've always been sure to design Harbeths so that they have an easy, benign electrical load and will work with just about any credible mainstream amplifier in the world.
”
